E-Mail:

Food Companies Really Like Blogging Moms

Blogging Moms are being wooed by food companies who see these parents as being of real valuable to associate with their products. Moms are finding that staying at home and blogging can be lucrative as food companies are starting to offer free trips, products and more. But with the FTC trying to impose guidelines for bloggers and free products they receive, is there a real conflict of interest?

The FTC has stated that bloggers must disclose financial incentives or product compensation if given to a blogger in exchange for a review. What is not clear is how these guidelines will be imposed. Some are saying that the FTC has guidelines that are unclear and that this causes confusion in the bloging community.

A recent article at the Los Angeles Times states the following:

But recently, these bloggers say, food companies have upped the ante, bombarding them with free trips to corporate kitchens and mountains of edible swag.

Starbucks, eager to get working parents drinking its Via instant coffee, sent limousines to shuttle bloggers in New York City for a private lunch with executives. They left with bags stuffed with coffee and offers of bottomless future refills.

Fast-food purveyor Taco Bell flew a group of bloggers from Maryland, Michigan and Missouri to California for a retreat this spring, paid for their lodging and let them spend the day creating new taco and burrito concoctions.

Kraft Foods curried favor with mommy bloggers by bringing some to Los Angeles for the Grilled Cheese Invitational, in an effort to get online parents hungry for cheese.

It’s a strategy that recalls post-World War II ad campaigns, in which women touted the benefits of certain laundry soaps and the household brands that would make them a domestic goddess.

“They handle the family budget,” said Amanda Vega, an industry consultant who specializes in social media and public relations. “People read them and believe them, because they’re easy to identify with.”

I can understand that consumers would believe a mommy blogger outside of the corporate environment than they would a star that has been paid to promote a product. But should the moms have to disclose who is giving them products? Would these promotions influence the reviews these Moms may provide?

Let me know what you think.

Comments welcome.

Source.

3 Comments

Yeah , but most moms use blogs to show how cute/awesome their kids are. That gets annoying when they even make facebook accounts.

Of course they should have to disclose it. Maybe only the really popular sites will ever get investigated, but in principle, if you’re being paid to say something and you lead people to believe its your own opinion, you’re withholding pertinent information that would factor into their purchasing decisions.

Even if you really do like the product/service, the fact that you’re getting paid to endorse it is still pertinent information for the potential buyer.

Everyone who considers buying something wants to know that they have an impartial source they can go to for comparing advertiser claims. If you try to confuse buyers by mixing paid advertisers into the pool sources that they consider impartial sources, then you’re violating their trust for the sake of your own financial gain. Its not quite exploitation, if indeed the blogger uses/recommends the product themselves, but it *does* demonstrate a glaring lack of integrity.

There has to be disclosure so that the potential buyer can see it and say, “nope, I’m looking for some fair and impartial reviews. I’d better move on.”

Blogger moms has really helped a lot in the advertising field. It is just fair to disclose information to help buyers decide properly.

What Do You Think?

 

Posted Recently