Can You Trust The Windows 7 Compatibility Report When Doing An Upgrade?
- 4
- Add a Comment
- Which Group Of Windows Users Are Switching To Windows 7? Those Who Are Using Vista
- As Of October 2009 Windows XP Still At 70%
- Windows 7 - Why Microsoft Won’t Have Problems Selling It
- Microsoft’s Windows 7 - Is It Enough? Or Will You Wait To Buy A New PC To Get It?
- There Is More To This Story Than Just The Article
As some of you may know, I am an MVP over at Scot’s Newsletter forum, and have been a member of the forum since Scot started it. The main expertise of the forum is for Linux support, but there are also some great expert advice when it comes to Windows as well. So when I read this post this morning about one user experiencing problems with an upgrade from Windows XP to Windows 7 on a 3 year old PC, I thought I would share this users experience with you who read the posts here at Lockergnome.
The user, Eric Legge, stated the following information in his post:
Hi all,
I just performed an upgrade to Windows 7 Home Premium from Windows XP Home for a relative with a Dell Dimension 3000 desktop PC.
The compatibility report did not indicate any serious problems with the upgrade.
Unfortunately after the final reboot, it can only boot to Safe Mode.
I tried Startup Repair from my Win7 repair disc, but it found nothing wrong with the startup.
There are no devices in the Device Manger with a yellow exclamation mark or red cross.
However, the computer failed to bring up the options to choose a Home, Work or Public network even though the wireless router was on and working and had been online with XP.
After I chose the Home network option with my own laptop, the setup required my wireless encryption key and then went online for updates.
Tomorrow I’ll try Safe Mode with networking to get online and get updates and drivers from Windows Update, if that fails, I’ll try connecting the PC by Ethernet cable to the router and then running the setup at startup from the install disc.
Any ideas would be appreciated because there are no reports of this problem on the web yet.
Other readers of the forum made some good suggestions, but when I was reading Eric’s post, my first thought was that I suspected a video display driver problem. At the end of his 2nd post, Eric confirmed this was the case and that the Windows 7 compatibility report should of warned him of this prior to the upgrade.
In his second post Eric stated the following from the compatibility report:
Windows Aero
Not capable
Your current graphics adapter won’t support the
Windows Aero user interface. Contact your PC manufacturer or retailer to see if
an upgrade is possible.
This should of alerted Eric to the fact that the video display may not work with Windows 7.
Finally he posted again with this conclusion:
Unfortunately the integrated graphics of the Dell Dimension 3000 is the Integrated Intel Extreme Graphics 2 chip.
This only supports DirectX 8 and Win7 requires a graphics card/chip that supports DirectX 9. Dell used a cheapo DirectX 8 chip in this 2006 computer. My own self-built 2005 desktop PC with an AMD Socket 939 motherboard has a Direct X 9.0 integrated chip and a PCI Express slot for a graphics card.
There is also no AGP or PCI Express slot for a graphics card, so the Dimension 3000 cannot be upgraded to Win7.
That shows the weakness in the compatibility report. It should have said that the graphics chip only supports DirectX 8 and that Win7 cannot be used unless the graphic card can be upgraded to a DirectX 9 card.
What this demonstrates is the importance of checking on the manufacturers web site to confirm that drivers are available for ALL of your hardware, prior to attempting an upgrade. Do not assume the upgrade will work without checking that Windows 7 will work prior to trying the upgrade process, especially when it comes to taking the leap from a machine designed for Windows XP.
There is one other thing I would like to share. Though Microsoft states that Windows 7 will function on a system with a processor of 1GHz and 1 GB of RAM, I seriously doubt that the user experience would be enjoyable on such a machine. Just my 2 cents.
Share your thoughts.
Comments welcome.

4 Comments
Bobzilla
November 14th, 2009
at 11:56am
Windows 7 upgrades will experience the same problems as did Vista. Vista and Win 7 will not preform very well with low end hardware…. when will you folks get this in your head? If you want Windows 7 to run smoothly,,,, buy a powerful (high end) new machine with Windows 7. If want to use your old hardware with a more powerful and stable OS, simply install Ubuntu.
Jeffery Fox
November 14th, 2009
at 3:56pm
Here’s a question for you: Do you have an open PCI slot? It may be possible to purchase a PCI conventional graphics card that will work with Windows 7. Earlier this year, I had installed a new graphics card for my eMachines T5026 with Windows 7 in mind. (It’s the PNY Verto GeForce 8400 GS PCI card with 512 MB RAM.)
Gary Bing
November 14th, 2009
at 6:13pm
I did it in the REC version in & and they thought everthing was hunky-dory even with my 8 year old Brother Laser attached to it. That was in the summer. I called Brother and they could not give me a 7 driver for it. They could’nt even confirm a new model number that would have a 7 driver. They kept asking me to let them help me install a Vista driver. I said I already have it. After going around 3 times on this, I finally hung up.I went to their site. And it said ” All Brother printers are compatible with the new Windows 7 operating system.” So don’t bother with Brother, but my brothers are having a REAL go around with HP.Let’s see. From Cannon to Xerox is anyone have drivers for Windows 7 on anything? I don’t do Lexmark and friends won’t let friends do the same.
Gary Bing
November 15th, 2009
at 7:30pm
P.S. I f you have an open PCI port just get a new video card. If you can’t use another video card because you dont have a slot for one then it becomes moot. But you will have to go into the bios and disable the embedded video on the mother board For help on this contact you computer or motherboard manufacture. If your mother board doesn’t support more than 2g of ram, your”e screwed any way. A new motherboard usually means new computer. You have to do a cost benefit analysis of this. A new computer usually wins. Your old computer from an OEM usually has a frustratingly hard to upgrade case and a weaK power supply so that’s pretty much out. But if you want to build your own computer be careful as the costs of ram and processors are about to be reevaluated. I can’t say jump right into it but I do know their is going to be some increases in pricing soon.There are some real deals on computers using AMD processors right now. I only do INTEL and building my own will get pretty expensive, only if I use my own disc drive with my old operating system XP or Vista Home Premium on both.I could conceivably run another hard drive on my home built on a RAID and get more efficiency/speed. I believe that all I have to do is purchase a 250g 75000 speed drive to match what I already have I don’t know if there are any other parameters on that exact issue.If you want to go to Windows 7 and have to buy your own copy and install it on your home built you’ll probably find you’ve got a great custom built that you are paying too much for than going with say Ipower, Cyberpower, et all. Good luck.