<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Desktop Touch Screens Just Don&#8217;t Work For Us Humans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/10/13/desktop-touch-screens-just-dont-work-for-us-humans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/10/13/desktop-touch-screens-just-dont-work-for-us-humans/</link>
	<description>Technology News, Reviews &#38; How-To</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 05:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Kearney</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/10/13/desktop-touch-screens-just-dont-work-for-us-humans/#comment-60825</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Kearney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=9363#comment-60825</guid>
		<description>The gorilla arm problem has been known about for some time.  Using a touchscreen ends up requiring a lot more arm strength than is comfortable by most people.  Other than in a few select instances (like presentations, industrial applications or point of sale) the touchscreen is not an ideal way to engage in most interactions with the computer.  For most individuals it&#039;s unlikely to ever offer much utility.  It&#039;s a handy gimmick, to be sure, but not enough to justify the costs to add it to a display.

Another point to consider is repeat activities and how that affects durability.  Users benefit from being able to depend upon things showing up in predictable places on the screen.  But this means any interaction with those functions is going to incur added wear on those locations.  Just take a look at retail touchscreens and note the worn out spots.  Or just look at your keyboard and note how frequently used keys like e,s, backspace and enter tend to have their lettering worn off more than others.  

Touchscreens are almost as useless as voice input, but not quite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The gorilla arm problem has been known about for some time.  Using a touchscreen ends up requiring a lot more arm strength than is comfortable by most people.  Other than in a few select instances (like presentations, industrial applications or point of sale) the touchscreen is not an ideal way to engage in most interactions with the computer.  For most individuals it&#8217;s unlikely to ever offer much utility.  It&#8217;s a handy gimmick, to be sure, but not enough to justify the costs to add it to a display.</p>
<p>Another point to consider is repeat activities and how that affects durability.  Users benefit from being able to depend upon things showing up in predictable places on the screen.  But this means any interaction with those functions is going to incur added wear on those locations.  Just take a look at retail touchscreens and note the worn out spots.  Or just look at your keyboard and note how frequently used keys like e,s, backspace and enter tend to have their lettering worn off more than others.  </p>
<p>Touchscreens are almost as useless as voice input, but not quite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/10/13/desktop-touch-screens-just-dont-work-for-us-humans/#comment-60824</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=9363#comment-60824</guid>
		<description>I think the solution to this is two screens. One to touch on and a higher display. Star Trek did it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the solution to this is two screens. One to touch on and a higher display. Star Trek did it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/10/13/desktop-touch-screens-just-dont-work-for-us-humans/#comment-60823</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=9363#comment-60823</guid>
		<description>I think we should keep touch screens for mobile devices only....thats the only way to have it convenient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we should keep touch screens for mobile devices only&#8230;.thats the only way to have it convenient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eduardo</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/10/13/desktop-touch-screens-just-dont-work-for-us-humans/#comment-60822</link>
		<dc:creator>Eduardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=9363#comment-60822</guid>
		<description>Touch screen for desktop. Advances in technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Touch screen for desktop. Advances in technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drumlind11</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/10/13/desktop-touch-screens-just-dont-work-for-us-humans/#comment-60821</link>
		<dc:creator>Drumlind11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=9363#comment-60821</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure that someone is going to think of a way to have touch screen while still making it comfortable. It might be a while, but still. You never know what will happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure that someone is going to think of a way to have touch screen while still making it comfortable. It might be a while, but still. You never know what will happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/10/13/desktop-touch-screens-just-dont-work-for-us-humans/#comment-60820</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=9363#comment-60820</guid>
		<description>i think that i could tilt down my touchsmart, but it only goes to about 45 degrees...

thats screwy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that i could tilt down my touchsmart, but it only goes to about 45 degrees&#8230;</p>
<p>thats screwy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Schenone</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/10/13/desktop-touch-screens-just-dont-work-for-us-humans/#comment-60819</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Schenone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=9363#comment-60819</guid>
		<description>
I&#039;d  like to see voice commands before I die! LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d  like to see voice commands before I die! LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buffet</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/10/13/desktop-touch-screens-just-dont-work-for-us-humans/#comment-60818</link>
		<dc:creator>Buffet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=9363#comment-60818</guid>
		<description>For me, the optimum way to interact with my computer would be like anyone else in Starfleet - verbally. How much longer till I don&#039;t have to touch anything? Not that Dragon stuff either. The Enterprise stuff. I can wait another year or so, I suppose - If i have to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, the optimum way to interact with my computer would be like anyone else in Starfleet &#8211; verbally. How much longer till I don&#8217;t have to touch anything? Not that Dragon stuff either. The Enterprise stuff. I can wait another year or so, I suppose &#8211; If i have to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mhz</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/10/13/desktop-touch-screens-just-dont-work-for-us-humans/#comment-60817</link>
		<dc:creator>mhz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=9363#comment-60817</guid>
		<description>There is no reason you should expect to ever have to use a touch screen. You&#039;ll always be able to use external input if you want. 

I would think that voice commands would be a much more useful area to focus on.

Touch screens are awkward in many respects if you&#039;re trying to use your fingers. They are okay if you only need to push a button, like the digital self checkouts at some grocery stores.

For detailed work of any kind, you need something more precise than a finger. With a stylus of some type they can be tolerable, but the other comment was correct that the &quot;ergonomic&quot; factor is pretty big over time. For people who have to sit at a desk and do precision screen work, it doesn&#039;t get much better than the current model. Just get a good chair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no reason you should expect to ever have to use a touch screen. You&#8217;ll always be able to use external input if you want. </p>
<p>I would think that voice commands would be a much more useful area to focus on.</p>
<p>Touch screens are awkward in many respects if you&#8217;re trying to use your fingers. They are okay if you only need to push a button, like the digital self checkouts at some grocery stores.</p>
<p>For detailed work of any kind, you need something more precise than a finger. With a stylus of some type they can be tolerable, but the other comment was correct that the &#8220;ergonomic&#8221; factor is pretty big over time. For people who have to sit at a desk and do precision screen work, it doesn&#8217;t get much better than the current model. Just get a good chair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zenium</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/10/13/desktop-touch-screens-just-dont-work-for-us-humans/#comment-60816</link>
		<dc:creator>zenium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=9363#comment-60816</guid>
		<description>Looking down at a screen will be a pain in the neck literally!

Your neck is not designed to look down all the time.

So I guess for touch screens it is either have your hands above your heart or have a pain in the neck.

No thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking down at a screen will be a pain in the neck literally!</p>
<p>Your neck is not designed to look down all the time.</p>
<p>So I guess for touch screens it is either have your hands above your heart or have a pain in the neck.</p>
<p>No thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 11/19 queries in 0.540 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: s3.lockergnome.com

Served from: www.lockergnome.com @ 2012-02-18 07:19:14 -->
