<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Faces Privacy Lawsuit &#8211; Is This Dumb Or What?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/08/18/facebook-faces-privacy-lawsuit-is-this-dumb-or-what/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/08/18/facebook-faces-privacy-lawsuit-is-this-dumb-or-what/</link>
	<description>Technology News, Reviews &#38; How-To</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 05:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook privacy lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/08/18/facebook-faces-privacy-lawsuit-is-this-dumb-or-what/#comment-60224</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook privacy lawsuit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=8144#comment-60224</guid>
		<description>[...] to the suit has largely been against the filing.  You can read criticism of the suit here and here.  Unless this was a pure publicity stunt, a law firm does not invest the time and resources on a [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the suit has largely been against the filing.  You can read criticism of the suit here and here.  Unless this was a pure publicity stunt, a law firm does not invest the time and resources on a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lew</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/08/18/facebook-faces-privacy-lawsuit-is-this-dumb-or-what/#comment-60223</link>
		<dc:creator>Lew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 01:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=8144#comment-60223</guid>
		<description>Lawsuit shows that even trial lawyers suffer in a recession...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawsuit shows that even trial lawyers suffer in a recession&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/08/18/facebook-faces-privacy-lawsuit-is-this-dumb-or-what/#comment-60222</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=8144#comment-60222</guid>
		<description>This sounds more than faintly ridiculous to me! 
By the way Ron, the plural of photo (or ANYTHING) does not have an apostrophe followed by an &quot;s&quot;. 
Don&#039;t start a sentence with &quot;Which&quot;, either&quot;.  :-)
Could also do with a comma or two in there.
Setup should be two separate words
If you need a good proof-reader, I&#039;m available!  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds more than faintly ridiculous to me!<br />
By the way Ron, the plural of photo (or ANYTHING) does not have an apostrophe followed by an &#8220;s&#8221;.<br />
Don&#8217;t start a sentence with &#8220;Which&#8221;, either&#8221;.  <img src='http://s3.lockergnome.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Could also do with a comma or two in there.<br />
Setup should be two separate words<br />
If you need a good proof-reader, I&#8217;m available!  <img src='http://s3.lockergnome.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brodypros</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/08/18/facebook-faces-privacy-lawsuit-is-this-dumb-or-what/#comment-60221</link>
		<dc:creator>brodypros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=8144#comment-60221</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure it was because of there information leaking into commercial advertising, but that&#039;s only what the cnet report said</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure it was because of there information leaking into commercial advertising, but that&#8217;s only what the cnet report said</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fucktards Share Photos Then Sue Over Privacy &#124; The Minority Report</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/08/18/facebook-faces-privacy-lawsuit-is-this-dumb-or-what/#comment-60220</link>
		<dc:creator>Fucktards Share Photos Then Sue Over Privacy &#124; The Minority Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=8144#comment-60220</guid>
		<description>[...] I facetiously blogged a few months ago that Facebook users were idiots. Well it turns out that some ARE idiots!! Check out this spurious lawsuit against the social networking giant.  The social networking site is facing a lawsuit in which the plaintiffs are complaining that their privacy is being violated when they share photo’s and such on the Facebook site. What doesn’t make any sense is that they are doing exactly what the Facebook site was originally designed to do. What is also strange is that the plaintiffs voluntarily joined Facebook knowing what the site was setup to do. Which in my opinion Facebook does very well. Facebook Faces Privacy Lawsuit &#8211; Is This Dumb Or What? ~ The Blade by Ron Schenone MVP [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I facetiously blogged a few months ago that Facebook users were idiots. Well it turns out that some ARE idiots!! Check out this spurious lawsuit against the social networking giant.  The social networking site is facing a lawsuit in which the plaintiffs are complaining that their privacy is being violated when they share photo’s and such on the Facebook site. What doesn’t make any sense is that they are doing exactly what the Facebook site was originally designed to do. What is also strange is that the plaintiffs voluntarily joined Facebook knowing what the site was setup to do. Which in my opinion Facebook does very well. Facebook Faces Privacy Lawsuit &#8211; Is This Dumb Or What? ~ The Blade by Ron Schenone MVP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 11/19 queries in 0.457 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: s3.lockergnome.com

Served from: www.lockergnome.com @ 2012-02-18 07:30:35 -->
