E-Mail:
Get our new Windows 7 eBook (PDF) for $7 with 70+ Tips. Download Now!

FCC: Cell Service In The U.S. Should Equal What The World Has

Picture this. On October 22nd when Windows 7 is released, Microsoft proclaims that the operating system is only to be used on an HP computer. Furthermore the HP system must use an Intel CPU, Seagate hard disk, Nvidia video card. No others need apply. Or how about this: You go down to purchase a new Chevy and you have to sign a two-year commitment that you will use Shell gas only in the vehicle. Do you think that consumers would be outraged?

Then why is it the Apple can dictate that its iPhone can only be used on an AT&T network? Or that a Pre can only be used on a Sprint Nextel network? Is there anyone watching out for those consumers who cannot get these services or products because they are outside of the carrier’s sphere of influence? Well the new head of the FCC seems to want to take on these issues and others.

Over at Bloomberg there’s an article that describes these issues and what the FCC may do to correct the problem with the help of Congress and the White House to get us all into the 21st century:

Genachowski, 46, declined to say what the next steps will be in the investigation, which the agency announced last month after four U.S. senators asked it to examine the exclusive deals. An AT&T executive told a June 17 hearing the deals spur innovation and help lower prices. Verizon Wireless said this month that new deals with handset makers will last no longer than six months, down from one to two years for most contracts.

“Promoting competition is absolutely a main function of the FCC,” said Genachowski.

He took office June 29 as the Obama administration’s choice to head the independent agency that sets rules for telephone, cable and broadcast companies.

Fostering high-speed Internet connections, or broadband, is a priority for the FCC, Genachowski said.

“There’s absolutely a sense of urgency in Congress, the White House, here at the agency, that we need to make sure that the United States communications infrastructure is appropriate for the 21st century,” he said.

Maybe, just maybe, we might be able to someday use an iPhone on any network we wish without being harpooned into using one single network of services. My understanding is that other countries of the world have already done this. It is about time that the U.S. follows their example.

Comments welcome.

Source.

3 Comments

Guillermo A Castañeda

August 1st, 2009
at 12:48pm

I see the point. I would love to have an IPhone, but I don’t have AT&T. However, when you’re going against an industry, you should then go against the rest. DirecTV would not be allowed to be the only NFL Sunday Ticket carrier. You would have to think about other licensing situations such as your team’s jersey being Reebok (or whoever makes them) and extremely expensive. Is it right to open up the competition? Would we have more companies losing their edge?

What Do You Think?

 

Posted Recently

47 queries / 0.674 seconds.