The Future Of Newspapers – Should It Be Illegal To Link?
Over at the Becker-Posner blog, Judge Posner has an interesting take on the future of newspapers. On his blog he states that it may be necessary to expand copyrighted laws to prohibit linking without the content providers consent. In his own words he states that:
Expanding copyright law to bar online access to copyrighted materials without the copyright holder’s consent, or to bar linking to or paraphrasing copyrighted materials without the copyright holder’s consent, might be necessary to keep free riding on content financed by online newspapers from so impairing the incentive to create costly news-gathering operations that news services like Reuters and the Associated Press would become the only professional, nongovernmental sources of news and opinion.
I do not believe that this will save the newspaper industry. There is a natural progression of things that happen when technology changes occur. The newspapers made a conscience decision to enter into the World Wide Web and now blame the Internet for their dismal performance. As advertisement revenues continued to shrink for print newspapers and magazines, heading to the Internet with ‘free’ stuff was doomed to fail.
Who’s fault was this? Google? I think not. The newspaper moguls made a conscience decision to enter into the newest media. In their minds they thought they could compete with free content and their business model that has been in existence since Gutenberg invented the printing press, did not work the way they thought it would.
The American auto industry did the same thing. When they couldn’t compete with the imports they cried to Congress that the foreign companies used cheaper labor and they couldn’t compete. So Congress placed restrictions on the foreign car companies. The American auto industry convinced Congress that Americans wanted huge SUV’s with big V-8’s and Congress put off any increase in fuel economy standards for over 2 decades. The real problem was that the foreign car companies were building a better car. You can only bull shit your way with rhetoric for so long before you start to slip in your own crap.
One may recall when the TV took hold in the American living room. Both radio and the movie theaters were all doomed. Funny isn’t it that radio and the movies are still with us. The theaters changed their business model from local neighborhood shows with single theaters to multi-complex theaters with 8, 10, 12, or more movies running at the same time.
Twitter is the perfect example of why newspapers will have a hard time keeping up, no matter how many laws they try to get passed. Twitter kept up with the turmoil in Iran and the death of Michael Jackson faster than any news agency could. What the U.S. newspaper industry still doesn’t grasp is that the WORLD is connected by the Internet.
What do you think?
Comments welcome.

6 Comments
Hotrao
June 29th, 2009
at 7:17am
In my opinion “traditional medias” entered an arena they are not able to fight in.
It’s not a fault of anyone if newspapers are not performing in the expected way and, on the other side, if they’re not competitive in digital world.
Maybe newspapers owners and CEOs thought that when the brand “New York Times” or similar accepted the challenge of being on the net, everybody on the internet would access they’re content.
Unfortunately is not like this in digital era, where information is mainly free for the end user and where good articles are available also to those that don’t write under big brands umbrella. I still love having news printed on paper (I’ve got a couple of subscriptions), but I access informations mainly from internet and free of charge.
I think that if newspapers don’t move out of they’re business model transposed to the net (i.e. subscription model) to reach a different one (e.g. pay per view or advertising or….who knows) they won’t be capable of surviving in this battle.
And this doesn’t pass through banning the ability to link news.
Future of newspapers and linking habits « How I see the world
June 29th, 2009
at 7:18am
[...] Future of newspapers and linking habits Ron Schenone at Lockergnome reports that at Becker-Posner blog, Judge Posner ”states that it may be necessary to expand copyright laws to prohibit linking without the content providers consent”. (full article at http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/06/29/the-future-of-newspapers-should-it-be-illegal-to-link/). [...]
Ryan Farmer
June 29th, 2009
at 1:21pm
I don’t think newspapers or TV news networks have anything to worry about.
As the Fox Noise Network is practically the mouthpiece of the Republican party and the oil and drug companies, I’m sure they will be propped up either through some kind of government windfall or directly through cash infusions from the Republican Party and Exxon Mobil.
You already see those “This segment brought to you by Pfizer” ads on Fox Noise.
MSNBC is well, Microsoft.
CNN has always kind of been the Fox Noise of the left.
And between all three, the govenment can still control what they report on and what they don’t through the FCC.
These “news” organizations are far too valuable to the government and to special interests to let fail.
Have you noticed all those corporate whitewashing commercials on how Exxon Mobil will save us all with hydrogen tech? How many Exxon stations, or how many cars for that matter, run on hydrogen fuel cells?
Creative Gift Basket Idea To Boost Anyone’s Life | Tips for gifts
June 29th, 2009
at 11:24pm
[...] The Future Of Newspapers – Should It Be Illegal To Link? lockergnome.com) [...]
The Future Of Newspapers - Should It Be Illegal To Link? - Blog Blog
June 30th, 2009
at 2:37am
[...] This article is featured on the custom Blog Blog at Auto-Blogs.us. [...]
Technology, newspapers, the future « Life is what you make it
July 5th, 2009
at 10:32am
[...] The Future Of Newspapers – Should It Be Illegal To Link? lockergnome.com) [...]