<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Linux, Mac OS Need Defragmentation Software?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/04/23/does-linux-mac-os-need-defragmentation-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/04/23/does-linux-mac-os-need-defragmentation-software/</link>
	<description>Technology News, Reviews &#38; How-To</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 01:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Gnoom</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/04/23/does-linux-mac-os-need-defragmentation-software/#comment-58028</link>
		<dc:creator>Gnoom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 15:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=5533#comment-58028</guid>
		<description>It is a myth that Linux and/or OS X file systems do not fragment. OS X on-the-fly defragments files smaller than 20MB, though. My current Linux install is about a month-old, and fragmentation figures for my partitions are as follows:

/  fragmented files: 36.973%; average fragments per file: 1.339

/home  fragmented files: 78.920%; average fragments per file: 2.879.

Note: I am running ext3 for both / and /home. Running a file system that supports extents and/or delayed allocation (e.g. xfs or ext4) should reduce fragmentation, but I don&#039;t think fragmentation will ever be zero in any case.

Regarding performance implication of fragmentation in Linux and/or OS X, I haven&#039;t seen any convincing benchmarks that  could tell me whether there&#039;s a performance degradation as a result of fragmentation or not. 

In conclusion, I would say that one should not worry about fragmentation as long as his/her computer performs normally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a myth that Linux and/or OS X file systems do not fragment. OS X on-the-fly defragments files smaller than 20MB, though. My current Linux install is about a month-old, and fragmentation figures for my partitions are as follows:</p>
<p>/  fragmented files: 36.973%; average fragments per file: 1.339</p>
<p>/home  fragmented files: 78.920%; average fragments per file: 2.879.</p>
<p>Note: I am running ext3 for both / and /home. Running a file system that supports extents and/or delayed allocation (e.g. xfs or ext4) should reduce fragmentation, but I don&#8217;t think fragmentation will ever be zero in any case.</p>
<p>Regarding performance implication of fragmentation in Linux and/or OS X, I haven&#8217;t seen any convincing benchmarks that  could tell me whether there&#8217;s a performance degradation as a result of fragmentation or not. </p>
<p>In conclusion, I would say that one should not worry about fragmentation as long as his/her computer performs normally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Farmer</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/04/23/does-linux-mac-os-need-defragmentation-software/#comment-58027</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Farmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=5533#comment-58027</guid>
		<description>Data fragmentation is really never a problem on Linux file systems (it can be, but you&#039;d really have to beat the crap out of the file system and leave it with very little free space) 

Ext2/3 are probably the most vulnerable, and after 2 years of daily use on an Ext3 partition, it was 1.9% fragmented.

XFS has xfs_fsr which you can invoke to &quot;defragment&quot; the file system, but it fragments even less than Ext2/3 do and the package which brings in xfs_fsr is not usualyl even installed by default (xfsdump).

Ext4 will have E4defrag, which is basically just a front end to the functionality that&#039;s already in the kernel/driver.

Really fragmentation is an afterthought because most of the reason, I think, Microsoft keeps NTFS with the behavior it exhibits is because Executive Software and Raxco are both MS partners and pay them a percentage of their sales.

There&#039;s really just no reason to design a file system that is susceptible to this. You also risk data loss on NTFS due to file fragmentation in some cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Data fragmentation is really never a problem on Linux file systems (it can be, but you&#8217;d really have to beat the crap out of the file system and leave it with very little free space) </p>
<p>Ext2/3 are probably the most vulnerable, and after 2 years of daily use on an Ext3 partition, it was 1.9% fragmented.</p>
<p>XFS has xfs_fsr which you can invoke to &#8220;defragment&#8221; the file system, but it fragments even less than Ext2/3 do and the package which brings in xfs_fsr is not usualyl even installed by default (xfsdump).</p>
<p>Ext4 will have E4defrag, which is basically just a front end to the functionality that&#8217;s already in the kernel/driver.</p>
<p>Really fragmentation is an afterthought because most of the reason, I think, Microsoft keeps NTFS with the behavior it exhibits is because Executive Software and Raxco are both MS partners and pay them a percentage of their sales.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s really just no reason to design a file system that is susceptible to this. You also risk data loss on NTFS due to file fragmentation in some cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connor Bryant</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/04/23/does-linux-mac-os-need-defragmentation-software/#comment-58026</link>
		<dc:creator>Connor Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=5533#comment-58026</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s one of the things PC&#039;s have that Mac&#039;s don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s one of the things PC&#8217;s have that Mac&#8217;s don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gozlag.com &#187; Such is the Life of a Geek</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/04/23/does-linux-mac-os-need-defragmentation-software/#comment-58025</link>
		<dc:creator>gozlag.com &#187; Such is the Life of a Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=5533#comment-58025</guid>
		<description>[...] Do Linux or OS X need defragmentation software? [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Do Linux or OS X need defragmentation software? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3G Chromakey ~ Windows Fanatics</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/04/23/does-linux-mac-os-need-defragmentation-software/#comment-58024</link>
		<dc:creator>3G Chromakey ~ Windows Fanatics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=5533#comment-58024</guid>
		<description>[...] Do Linux or OS X need defragmentation software? [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Do Linux or OS X need defragmentation software? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/04/23/does-linux-mac-os-need-defragmentation-software/#comment-58023</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=5533#comment-58023</guid>
		<description>I keep seeing people who bring up the Net Applications figures, which are Apple&#124;MS-sponsored. http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/04/microsoft-apple-net-applications/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep seeing people who bring up the Net Applications figures, which are Apple|MS-sponsored. <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/04/microsoft-apple-net-applications/" rel="nofollow">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/04/microsoft-apple-net-applications/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/04/23/does-linux-mac-os-need-defragmentation-software/#comment-58022</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=5533#comment-58022</guid>
		<description>Linux only needs defrag if the hard disk is getting full.

Otherwise, no it doesn&#039;t.

Linux does have defrag tools, but they only work if you unmount the disk before you run them - not practical in many cases (especially if you want to defrag the drive with /bin on it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linux only needs defrag if the hard disk is getting full.</p>
<p>Otherwise, no it doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Linux does have defrag tools, but they only work if you unmount the disk before you run them &#8211; not practical in many cases (especially if you want to defrag the drive with /bin on it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Greene</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/04/23/does-linux-mac-os-need-defragmentation-software/#comment-58021</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=5533#comment-58021</guid>
		<description>As a distribution developer that pays attention to filesystem development, I know for fact that fragmentation of files and of data segments CAN occur. Ever had a crash in Linux and then watched as fsck happily told you that you have 8.9% or more fragmentation? Yes. While in most cases, it is file and not data segments that are strewn across the drive, it does occur in those cases. I use XFS for the very reason that it has a &quot;defrag&quot; utility as part of it&#039;s toolset. Mind, I&#039;d love to see if the tool from Diskkeeper will include optimising directories, since on a mail server that would be killer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a distribution developer that pays attention to filesystem development, I know for fact that fragmentation of files and of data segments CAN occur. Ever had a crash in Linux and then watched as fsck happily told you that you have 8.9% or more fragmentation? Yes. While in most cases, it is file and not data segments that are strewn across the drive, it does occur in those cases. I use XFS for the very reason that it has a &#8220;defrag&#8221; utility as part of it&#8217;s toolset. Mind, I&#8217;d love to see if the tool from Diskkeeper will include optimising directories, since on a mail server that would be killer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kesav</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/04/23/does-linux-mac-os-need-defragmentation-software/#comment-58020</link>
		<dc:creator>kesav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=5533#comment-58020</guid>
		<description>FWIW, I use Diskeeper 2009 Pro on my 2 XP desktops and a vista notebook, and it does a great job. Never had a problem with it, and it&#039;s been unintrusive but efficient in doing it&#039;s work behind the scenes. I don&#039;t intend on switching to Mac or Linux any time soon, but I would be curious to see what the Diskeeper guys come up with.

Searching for OS X on the DK site throws up this field study exercise. Have any of you guys participated?
http://www.diskeeper.com/blog/post/2009/02/04/Mac-Fragmentation-Field-Study.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, I use Diskeeper 2009 Pro on my 2 XP desktops and a vista notebook, and it does a great job. Never had a problem with it, and it&#8217;s been unintrusive but efficient in doing it&#8217;s work behind the scenes. I don&#8217;t intend on switching to Mac or Linux any time soon, but I would be curious to see what the Diskeeper guys come up with.</p>
<p>Searching for OS X on the DK site throws up this field study exercise. Have any of you guys participated?<br />
<a href="http://www.diskeeper.com/blog/post/2009/02/04/Mac-Fragmentation-Field-Study.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.diskeeper.com/blog/post/2009/02/04/Mac-Fragmentation-Field-Study.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Schenone</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/04/23/does-linux-mac-os-need-defragmentation-software/#comment-58019</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Schenone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp3.lockergnome.com/blade/?p=5533#comment-58019</guid>
		<description>Again, thanks to all of you who have made a comment. I learned something new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, thanks to all of you who have made a comment. I learned something new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 11/19 queries in 0.490 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: s3.lockergnome.com

Served from: www.lockergnome.com @ 2012-02-18 18:14:18 -->
