E-Mail:
Get our new Windows 7 eBook (PDF) for $7 with 70+ Tips. Download Now!

Consumer Reports - 3 Free Softwares To Protect Your PC

So I am roaming around the Internet when I find this article about anti-viruses and some of the testing done by Consumer Reports. I also discovered in my searching a  an interesting article at the Washington Post in which some of the anti-virus companies and others chastised the way Consumer Reports tested the software. It seems Consumer Reports wrote their own viruses for the testing.

But first I present this statement:

Users who practice careful computing and want to protect their computers without paying fees should consider free software. Consumer Reports testers combined three free online security programs — Avira AntiVir Personal Edition Classic 7, Microsoft Windows Defender, and SPAMfighter Standard — and assembled them into a makeshift suite that actually performed better than some lo-rated suites. The freeware suite lacks the optimal protection and rich features of the best suites, but it provides decent protection, is easy enough to use, and won’t hog much of a computer’s memory.

It seems that Consumer Reports has compiled Avira AntiVir Personal Edition Classic 7, Microsoft Windows Defender and SPAMfighter standard, all freebies, as being just as good as some of the low rated suites they tested. What is also surprising is that Consumer Reports found these three to be easy on memory and not a hog like some suites are. Interesting.

The Washington Post article states that:

Consumer Reports recently came under heavy fire from some in the anti-virus industry for creating some 5,500 new virus variants to see how well a dozen leading products faired in detecting the new nasties. More than 100 security experts and executives from companies like Microsoft and HP as well as anti-virus vendors F-Secure, Kaspersky, McAfee, Sophos, Symantec and Trend Micro signed their names to a declaration denouncing Consumer Reports’ methods, stating that it is “not necessary and … not useful to write computer viruses to learn how to protect against them.”

I do not have a subscription to Consumer Reports so I was unable to find how they rated the standard software most of us are familiar with. If someone could provide that information, it would be appreciated.

I must admit I am surprised about the 3 freebies Consumer Report recommends. I may have to change my thinking about how I protect my personal systems. What do you think? Is what Consumer Reports states on the money? Or are they all wet? Share your thoughts.

Comments welcome.

Source

Washington Post

5 Comments

I am also surprised. I would have thought AVG would have been part of the mix as it seems to be the free anti-virus of choice these days.

Make & model Score
BitDefender Internet Security 2008 80
McAfee Internet Security Suite with SiteAdvisor 80
Kaspersky Internet Security 7 78
Trend Micro Internet Security 2008 78
Check Point ZoneAlarm Internet Security Suite 75
Symantec Norton Internet Security 2008 74
Microsoft Windows Live OneCare 74
F-Secure Internet Security 2008 73
A FREE SUITE 60
Avira AntiVir Personal Edition Classic 7
Microsoft Windows Defender
SPAMfighter Standard
CA Internet Security Suite Plus 2008 55
PC Tools Internet Security 2008 53

Not surprised that Norton scored low. I just replaced that bloat-ware performer with highly acclaimed (yet relatively unknown) ESET Smart Security. Frugal with resources and very effective (recommended by my IT guy). I had AVG Free on my last computer and in over two years never got a virus. That one was recommended by the satellite installer who set up my equipment/link. CR has always gone the extra mile to get the job done. They sometimes go overboard (like any true geeks) but to chastise them for their testing protocols is silly and reflects on the abysmal scores from those proprietary crapware companies.

Sounds like another deaal like when they were trying to prove that suvs rolled easily. Their testdriver couldn’t get it to roll over and got fired for his trouble. They’ve pulled other fast ones too. I would give this report a zero credence.

What Do You Think?

 

Posted Recently

46 queries / 0.624 seconds.