Apple vs PC – Should You Pay Twice As Much For a Mac?
The debate between Apple vs a PC has been going on since the early 80′s and continues on to this day. The main reason that we still talk about which is best, is that in the technology field, we all run out of things to discuss. So on a slow news day, it is always a good read to stir the pot up and toss out the Apple vs PC debate, Intel vs AMD and for awhile it was Microsoft buying Yahoo vs Google debate.
In this article from Microsoft Watch, it states:
On Saturday, Aug. 2, I got to wondering about Mac versus Windows PC pricing after seeing two HP notebooks on sale at the local Target. One of them, a 14-inch model, the HP DV2946NR, sold for $699.99 and packed 4GB of memory and a 320GB hard drive. Capacity for both features is twice that of the $1,299 MacBook—and shared graphics is 356MB compared with a meager 144MB for the MacBook. I wondered: If Vista notebooks are selling for so little and packing so much, how does this compare with Mac desktops and notebooks?
Today I contacted Stephen Baker, NPD’s vice president of industry analysis, about computer average selling prices at retail. That HP notebook is right on mark: ASP for retail Windows notebooks is $700. Mac laptops: $1,515. Yeah, right, they’re more than twice as much. But there’s more: The ASP for Mac desktops is more than $1,000 greater than for Windows PCs, and Mac desktop ASPs were higher in June than they were two years ago.
The article goes on to make some of the same arguments, using the same logic that has been used over the years. But my thinking is this. If people who buy Apple systems are willing to pay twice as much over the cost of a PC, there must be a real reason as to why this is true.
So to you Apple / Mac zealots I ask the following question. Why do you pay twice as much for a Apple computer and not just buy a PC? Is the Apple system really twice as good?
Your comments as always are welcome.





