Would You Want To Own Your Internet Connection?
- 3
- Add a Comment
Over at Google they have an article which describes the prospect of owning your own Internet connection and what it might take to do it. They also discuss an experiment going on up in Canada, in which 400 homeowners will be able to purchase thier own Internet connection. In the Google article it states:
It may sound strange, and it’s certainly not what we’re used to. Today we have a “carrier-centered” model; phone and cable companies spend billions to build, operate, and own the “last-mile” connection — the copper, cable, or fiber wires that come into your house. Individual consumers then pay for particular services, like phone service or Internet access.
In turn, we tend to think about broadband deployment in carrier-centric ways. If we want to see super-fast fiber connections rolled out to consumers, the main question appears to be whether carriers have appropriate incentives to invest.
But there’s no law of nature that says this is the only possible model. Many businesses, governments, universities, and other entities already own their own fiber connections, rather than leasing access to lines. It may also be possible to find ways for consumers to purchase their own last-mile strands of fiber.
Here, as anywhere, there would be certain advantages that come with ownership over renting. No one necessarily needs to own skis or a car, but many of us do. If you owned your own fiber, you’d be able to connect it to a service provider of your own choosing. Over time, you might save money, and it could make your house more valuable to have a fiber “tail.”
The main challenges with this model are economic, rather than technical. Most importantly, ownership has to be made appealing and affordable to consumers. The construction company is using conservative estimates that only 10% of homeowners will sign up and there will be a per-customer cost of $2700. If you assume 50% take-up, then the per-customer cost drops to $1100. Both figures might seem like a lot, but people pay for a variety of improvements to their home — like remodeled kitchens, or a deck — that also cost large sums.
This model faces other significant obstacles as well and it may only be possible in certain circumstances, if it’s practical at all. But the only way to really figure that out is to experiment. Cable television started out as CATV — community antenna television, an experiment by individual entrepreneurs and rural towns to deliver broadcast signals across longer distances. The Internet started as an experiment in the research community before becoming the worldwide network we know today.
So the real challenge that I see, is anyone going to want to do this? Are home owners going to fork out $2700 or more to have their own connection? Is it worth it?
What do you think?
Comments welcome.

3 Comments
Wolfhard
July 24th, 2008
at 6:56pm
The question is: Where’s the fiber of you own connected to? Do you need a provider in the backend or is it based on a “community based peering agreement” which is directly connected to an internet backbone? THAT would be interesting and in the long run $2700 would not be much for that (of cource you must not forget maintenance costs etc.).
Exothermic Reaction
July 25th, 2008
at 4:03pm
If I could bypass my last mile provider economically, I certainly would. I use absolutely zero services from my ISP. All I need is backbone access. I have my own DNS, e-mail, etc,… When something goes down it is usually something within the ISP infrastructure that has obstructed the connection between the backbone and my equipment.
Exo
Sean
July 29th, 2008
at 9:15pm
Anything to dump the on-again, off-again 5MBps service I’m currently getting through Charter. I know the stupid cable modem is just fine, I bought it a month ago. If I’m told to remove my router from the circuit, reboot my computer and restart the cable one more time, I’m gonna call in a tactical nuclear strike on their call center even though it will cause an international incident. The problem is probably an intermittent in an amplifier down the street, but it seems to self heal whenever the truck rolls. Unless the guy in the truck is just pretending to measure signal strengths. There’s only so many times you can change the splitter and claim that it’s fixed the problem. Good grief, I could just go unscrew the cable at the box and plug it back in and make that claim. So, if putting in fiber optic cable to the DSLAM just up the street could bypass all the 70’s copper that’s too corroded to pass DSL and was offered at a reasonable price, I’d probably be right on it.
But then the 5-10 minute outage every 45 minutes gives me time to read books. Maybe I should just resign myself to it being “the way things are”.