Google Warning – Microsoft Is Bad For The Internet

Posted by on Feb 4, 2008 | 5 Comments

Seems that the war between Google and Microsoft is turning a little more accusatory even since Microsoft protested the Google – Double Click deal. On their blog Google calls Microsoft’s recent activities  in trying to buy Yahoo a serious threat to all consumers. Citing previous illegal and deceptive practices when it came to the PC, Google fears that Microsoft could stop any type of innovation on the Internet if the deal proceeds.

The Google blog states:

 The openness of the Internet is what made Google — and Yahoo! — possible. A good idea that users find useful spreads quickly. Businesses can be created around the idea. Users benefit from constant innovation. It’s what makes the Internet such an exciting place.

So Microsoft’s hostile bid for Yahoo! raises troubling questions. This is about more than simply a financial transaction, one company taking over another. It’s about preserving the underlying principles of the Internet: openness and innovation.

Could Microsoft now attempt to exert the same sort of inappropriate and illegal influence over the Internet that it did with the PC? While the Internet rewards competitive innovation, Microsoft has frequently sought to establish proprietary monopolies — and then leverage its dominance into new, adjacent markets.

Could the acquisition of Yahoo! allow Microsoft — despite its legacy of serious legal and regulatory offenses — to extend unfair practices from browsers and operating systems to the Internet? In addition, Microsoft plus Yahoo! equals an overwhelming share of instant messaging and web email accounts. And between them, the two companies operate the two most heavily trafficked portals on the Internet. Could a combination of the two take advantage of a PC software monopoly to unfairly limit the ability of consumers to freely access competitors’ email, IM, and web-based services? Policymakers around the world need to ask these questions — and consumers deserve satisfying answers.

Google sees that way that Microsoft destroyed Netscape and wonders if they could do the same to Google. Microsoft could try and lock out users of certain services from using Yahoo or other content providers. It is unfortuante but Google does have some valid points. Recently the court has extended the oversight of Microsoft and its Windows operating system indicating the Redmond company still doesn’t play well with others.

What do you think? Is what Google saying justified or just part of their revenge against Microsoft?

Comments welcome.

Full Google article is here.

[tags]google, microsoft, yahoo, competition, consumers, windows, courts,  [/tags]

  • Mike

    I, for one, think if Google continues to do what they do and improve and innovate they’ve got nothing to worry about because a good service/product carries itself.

    On the flip side, this is the US–land of capitalism and free enterprise and Microsoft isn’t doing anything wrong. Everyone slams Microsoft for trying to monopolize their industry. What about the cable companies and power companies and natural gas companies who have consumers by the you know what? Those are things we must pay for EVERY DAY, EVERY MONTH, EVERY YEAR for the rest of our lives yet no one ever questions these entities.

    At least we all have a choice as to whether we use Microsoft products or not especially with all the open source, freeware and other such things out there available to all.

    IMO, M$ should stick to what they know and make their existing products solid instead of trying to be all things to all people but having a solid search provider might just enhance their existing products…you never know.

    peace all!

  • tbsteph

    Google has one interest – protect its dominace in the search/internet ad business. Everything else is window dressing (Pardon the pun.) Finally, I’m a bit weary with the idea MS killed Netscape by integrating IE into Windows. IE became the dominant browser because it was a superior product. What I remember most about Netscape was the constant crashing and continuous need to find plug-ins to view various sites.

  • zenium tech

    While Google’s complaints may seem a bit over done, I agree with the premise. Microsoft is not to be trusted and will use (no make that abuse) its monopoly power.

    My most recent example: Apple OS-X in the office. Prior to OS-X Microsoft produced an Apple compatible Office Suite with a FULL Outlook client. Once Apples started to encroach on the office desktops, Microsoft no longer produces an Outlook client for Macs. Now it is Entourage based on a WebDAV interface. Horrible mess to use. Missing features and the synchronization between MS Exchange Server and client is clumsy at best.

    Why did MS do this? IMHO because without an Outlook client, the Mac becomes less attractive for the one killer application for businesses – corporate email.

    On another note. Because of acquisitions over the years my long time ISP email address ended up at Yahoo. If MS purchases Yahoo, I will be changing my personal email address. I will never trust my email to MS, period.

  • http://wp3.lockergnome.com/nexus/blade/ Ron Schenone

    Thanks to everyone for your comments. They are appreciated. It should be extremely interesting to see what happens.

    Regards, Ron

  • http://computerconsultingkit.biz Computer Consulting Kit Blog

    One of the great things about any industry, but particularly the tech industry is what results when there is healthy competition. I think we’ve seen what happens when one company takes over; besides decreasing the number of options for those that rely on technology, including businesses and also just home computer users, it typically decreases the quality of these options (and the characteristics that made them unique and fitting for different types of uses in the first place). I hope that all companies involved will continue to innovate and vie with each other to create the best products, because it only makes the options stronger and more varied.