E-Mail:
Author Avatar

Vista SP1 vs. XP SP3 - Which Is Faster?

You got love it. Rumors are already surfacing that XP SP3 is twice as fast as Vista SP1. Naturally no data is brought forth to substantiate these finding, but it does make for good reading. So with this in mind, I decided to run some unscientific tests on my test computer that currently dual boots Vista with the SP1 beta and XP with the SP3 beta. The nice thing about this type of setup is that both systems use the same computer with the same specifications.

Before I begin posting the results, I just want to say that I would suspect that XP is going to be quicker. Why? Those pretty graphics and sidebar take some time to load. Whereas XP is void of this eye candy. So I sat down with my stop watch in hand to take a look-see which is faster. Another side note. These are beta releases only and performance for both may improve when the final releases are released.

Well I did these tests 3 times just to confirm my findings. I timed boot up for each from the dual boot menu, opening MS Word, Firefox and Internet Explorer in both operating systems. I won’t bore you with the times, but not surprising Windows XP is a whopping 50% faster + in all of the above. On second thought, maybe it is surprising. Until one actually times the events, I really hadn’t perceived that much of a difference after installing SP1.

One note. Vista with SP1 is definitely faster than without SP1. It was really poky before the update.

Maybe I should includes the times for my system:

Vista boot 1min. 21 sec., Word 2007 13 sec., Firefox 15 sec., and I.E. 9 sec.

XP boot 50 sec. , Word 2003 6 sec., Firefox 10 sec., and I.E. 6 sec.

Another thing I noticed. On both Vista and XP I have AVG Free Edition running which needed updating. On XP it connected immediately to the download server and updated quickly. On Vista it took about 20 seconds [I didn’t actually time it], before a connection with the server was made. In all fairness this could of been the AVG server itself and does not truly reflect anything.

Again, this was totally none scientific and only with one computer system. Before coming to any solid conclusions, I’d like to get some other opinions. We may have to wait until both beta’s are released to the public for testing.

Comments welcome.

Tags: , , , , ,

9 Comments

Vista Sp1 vs XP SP3 - Which Is Faster?…

Did you see the post at feed.lockergnome.com…

[…] Vista Sp1 vs XP SP3 - Which Is Faster? » This Summary is from an article posted at The Blade by Ron Schenone, MVP on Tuesday, November 27, […]

[…] Vista Sp1 vs XP SP3 - Which Is Faster? » This Summary is from an article posted at The Blade by Ron Schenone, MVP on Tuesday, November 27, […]

Hello Ron,
I find your boot times to be super slow.
I can boot Windows Vista in 31 seconds and that includes putting in my password. No SP1 installed im going to wait for final release.
It takes almost a minute + to boot XP.
All test were done on the same PC with the same hardware.
AMD X2 3800+ 2GB RAM,150GB Raptor 10,000rpm drive.
I noticed Vista starts faster and shut down faster this is the only reason I timed it just to be sure. After reading how slow it is online from multiple places I just dont buy it! When I timed it I said to myself yes im right, my observations were indeed correct. All test were fair put on the same clean wiped hard drive. With all updates.

Hi JJ,
Thanks for sharing your experience with us.
Ron

Hello Ron,

I am Windows XP Software Expert. I suggest that you keep a setting of Prefetch to keep it enabled for apps only that is setting under the Prefetch Management key in the registry to keep the prefetch enabled for apps only. You will boot much faster. Though personally you may not agree on disabling the prefetch for boot but I have seen that it reduces the boot time by 75%.

I agreed XP faster than Vista on running Application but Vista is much secure than XP…

[…] Lockergnome Ron Schenone reported that XP SP3 is twice as fast as Vista SP1 after decided to run some […]

How about XP vs Vista with the sidebar and Aero turned off, I am curious to see how XP SP3 and Vista SP1 handle if Aero has those two features turned off.

I can run Aero and side bar quite well but don’t, I find it better. That said I am currently loading a dual-boot between Vista and a Linux based system, more for curiosity then anything, I don’t hate Vista - it’s quite nice.

What Do You Think?

 


Anti-Spam Image

Want to Start a Blog Here for Free?

Are you an expert in one subject or another? If your goal is to help others and dispense hard-earned information back to the community, stake a claim on your very own Lockergnome blog today! You can write about anything - no matter the topic. Sign-up to start blogging!