FCC – Cable Companies Too Dominant

Posted by on Nov 12, 2007 | 6 Comments

There is some indication that the FCC just may level the playing field when it comes to cable companies and open the market up to other competitors. If the FCC does decide to make any changes, they could happen sometime this month according to an article over at the New York Times. It appears that the FCC does have the authority to regulate more closely the actions of the cable companies, which seems to have come under fire for high cable tv rates.

According to the Times:

The finding, under a law that gives the commission expanded powers over the cable television industry if it becomes too big, is expected to be announced this month. It is a major departure for the agency and the industry, which was deregulated by an act of Congress in 1996.

Officials say the finding could lead to more diverse programs; consumer groups say it could also lead to lower rates.

Heavily promoted by those groups and by the commission’s Republican chairman, Kevin J. Martin, the decision would be a notable exception to the broad deregulatory policies of the Bush administration. Officials in various agencies have relaxed industry regulations and have chosen not to challenge big corporate mergers.

More competition and lower rates would be nice for all of us who use cable services.

Comments welcome.

[tags]fcc, cable, competition, lower rates, regulations,  [/tags]

  • Don Naphen

    Ah, I see you have a new format now … the anti-spam word cop! Hey, whatever works Ron. Ok, on to the subject at hand: The FCC. Being a regulatory agency, it’s restricted ( by way of the Communications Act ) in dealing with such things as rate structures and the like. And of course, Congress is there to enact laws to keep things on a level playing field. That said, I’d have to say that big $$$$’s will probably win out on this one Ron. I’ve seen articles in the past addressing an “A La Carte” choice of cable channels, with the usual “It would cost you more” response from Comcast, RCN and others in the industry.

    The big thing in cable advertising is packaging. Huge numbers of channels offered, but how many are actually of interest to any one consumer? I don’t need 3 or 4 shopping channels, 3 or 4 bilingual offerings (I only speak English!), and various religious channels. BUT, others may choose to watch them, and so yes, I’m in favor of choosing the channels I wish to view, and not be forced to pay for others viewing habits. Do I think this will actually play out in the near future? Absolutely not! Too many dollars involved in this industry Ron, and unless there’s a mass exodus to satellite services (and they have their “package deals” also), neither one of us will see any changes that will actually bring down the price.

    My solution: join the local Club, and for the price of a drink and good conversation, watch TV first class on a hi-def wide screen. LOL

  • http://wp3.lockergnome.com/nexus/blade/ Ron Schenone

    Hi Don,
    Thanks for sharing your thoughts and for the comments. I must agree that I also doubt that prices will fall like a stone. Also the extra channel junk is a waste of time. I’m only using cable for broadband access right now. Dish for TV.

    Though I do like your idea about the social club aspect. :-)

    Regards, Ron

    PS The entire LG site will be changing completely very soon. At least that is what I have been told.

  • Denny

    Hi Ron

    As you know I’m a member of a SOCIAL–CLUB…….
    But there all in BED at 8:00….!..
    …………and………
    Everytime our Cable CO. adds a new station for FREE its in SPANISH..?

  • http://wp3.lockergnome.com/nexus/blade/ Ron Schenone

    Hi Denny,
    Those Wigwam Warriors are a tough bunch to keep up with. I hope they are not too taxing for you.
    Maybe they will stay up this evening to see the 9 er’s get whipped! LOL

    Later, Ron

  • Goose

    Hey!
    How did Denny get in here without knowing how to spell the security word!

  • http://wp3.lockergnome.com/nexus/blade/ Ron Schenone

    For Denny we made the security word ‘who know dat’. :-)