E-Mail:
Get our new Windows 7 eBook (PDF) for $7 with 70+ Tips. Download Now!

Microsoft Windows Vista SP1 Beta Part #2

  • No Related Post

I m happy to report that SP1 really has improved the performance on my Vista Ultimate system. The performance is not so much about the system operating faster, but that it is now equal to the performance of XP.

Some examples.

Deleting files was slow before SP1 beta. I’m talking pokey slow. No more. It is just like XP now. Delete and gone. Same with the recycle bin. Zap and gone.

Networking improvements. Previously when you tried to transfer files across the network it was molasses slow. Gone. Now the files transfers just like they do in XP.

Coming out of Hibernation or Sleep mode has been improved and seems to be a bit faster and yes, more like XP. :-)
Other features are:

Create a recovery disk. For those of you who didn’t get a Vista disk with your system, Microsoft now has included a utility to create a recovery disk.

Disk defrag. The option has been added to select which volume to defrag.

This is strange. Microsoft has changed the terminology on their Vista Extra screen page. From cutting edge technology and services to plain vanilla updates. This is going to be a real sore spot for those who plunked out their dollars expecting that Microsoft was going to offer users innovative technology. Looks like Microsoft is doing a quick back peddle. Ultimate should be renamed DULLimate.

The sorta bad:

I received an email this AM from another tester who asked me to try an experiment. He asked that I try and move a large number of files to see if I experienced an out of memory message. He stated that this was a known issues in Vista and didn’t seem to be fixed in SP1 beta.

My wife is a pack rat. In her My Doc’s she has 25,862 files, in 152 folders totaling some 973+ MB. I burned everything onto a DVD using Nero with her system using XP Media Center Edition. This is Gateway laptop with a AMD 1.8 Ghz Turion 64 with 512 MB of memory. Copying the files over to Nero to be burnt took about 4 minutes. The burning process took another 11 minutes since I dropped the write speed down to 4X to get a good burn. I immediately took out the DVD and than copied her entire My Doc’s folder into a new folder which took another 4 minutes. During this entire time everything worked perfectly.

Over to my Vista desktop box. This is a AMD 2.8Ghz with 2GB physical RAM and 2GB using Ready Boost. I used the Send To command to copy everything from the DVD over to the Documents folder which took about 9 minutes. I than turned around and copied the Documents folder over to a new folder which took 6 minutes. No out of error message but I did notice something while doing these procedures. I have a Gadget that measures memory on the system. I don’t know how accurate it is but it provides some info on how much memory is being used. Before the file transfers it showed available 1,479 MB of 2044 MB with 543MB used. After the file transfer it showed 779MB being used. At first I thought the memory was not being released as reported by others. I left the system and came back about an hour later and saw that the memory had return fairly close to where it was before the transfer with 548MB being used.

As a final experiment I copied all the files and folders mentioned above from my wife’s system over to my Vista system without a hitch. Go figure.

I did send my friend the link for a fix that Microsoft has posted found here.

It doesn’t appear that this problem affects every Vista system.

Observation:

I wonder if we will ever see PowerToys for Vista?

Comments welcome.

[tags]microsoft, windows, vista, SP1 beta, [/tags]

4 Comments

I know this will, as some read it, be taken as the words of a Microsoft hater - that is really far from the truth, but I have been really disappointed, going back to when, during the development cycle we found out about how many things were NOT going into Vista that were promised.

Your assessments each show how things got better - subjectively as good as XP - the question should be then, why do ANY work to switch to something that AT BEST is only as good as XP.

What a colossal disappointment!

I forgot to say that the out of memory error is something I experienced with the beta, but hadn’t during the time I used the released product - but I was looking at all of the other problems more closely.

This has no point of entry other than my mind - I believe that, if you read the account by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes at ZDNet, the problem is a memory leak that does show up under some instances in XP, and has been around in every Windows since 3.0 - just my thoughts, but I have spoken and written about it, and have been able to demonstrate it on every version of Windows I’ve tried - I think it is a basic problem in the code that has been slowed by more resources and more speed(to be able to recover) being available - but the core problem is the same, and is still a ghost in the machine.

Hi Marc,
My thoughts as well. SP1 is to try and get Vista up to speed with XP. I also agree that to many promises have been broken. Ultimate is turning out to be some kind of a fraud. I think we will see a class action lawsuit if MS fails to come up with something other than Texas Hold’em and DreamScene.

I now better understand the problem and it looks like SP1 has no cure. :-(

Thanks for the comments.

Ron

[...] If you were wondering what juicy goodies the imminent arrival of Vista Service Pack One is going to bring to your system then keep an eye on this beta test report. [...]

What Do You Think?

 

Posted Recently

41 queries / 0.596 seconds.