E-Mail:

Dell + Ubuntu = Raising Some Questions

Today is going to be the day, according to the secret Dell employee email, when Dell announces their new Linux lineup of computers using Ubuntu. So I took a look at the Dell site [Direct2Dell] which is the official blog for Dell itself. I was looking for any word about a release date for the Linux boxes and than started reading what Dell has to say about the upcoming release.

Some items mentioned were:

We recommend Linux users buy Dell printers that have PostScript engines in them. The previous hyperlink lists those printers. You can also check in the Tech Specs tab for each printer on Dell.com show if it has PostScript or not.

This sounds like to me that if your current printer doesn’t support PostScript you will need a purchase a new one, like what Dell recommends. Hmmmm……… its not even out and I have to buy new hardware?

For hardware options not offered with this release, we are working with the vendors of those devices to improve the maturity and stability of their associated Linux drivers. While this may not happen overnight, we do expect to have a broader range of hardware support with Linux over time.

Does this mean we have to wait until Service Pack #1 ? Is this Linux or Vista?

At this time, we are not including any support for proprietary audio or video codecs that are not already distributed with Ubuntu 7.04. These include MPEG 1/2/3/4, WMA, WMV, DVD, Quicktime, etc. We are evaluating options for providing this support in the future.

Yeap, sounds like a Service Pack coming our way.

I can hear it now. “I’m not buying a Dell Linux box until ALL of the support drivers are available”. I don’t think this is a very good start to launching a Dell Linux box. Just my 2 cents.

What do you think? Comments welcome.

Side note - the Dell Linux boxes should be available for viewing after 4:00pm CDT today here. :-)

[tags]dell, ubuntu, problems, [/tags]

4 Comments

I don’t think that Dell was planning on a big business rollout. I know that if I were specifying new systems for a customer, with a network in place already, I’d recommend the purchase of just 1 machine. I would evaluate for 90 days, and if the test program was successful, then purchase the rest of what was needed.

As for printers, don’t you think most businesses have at least one networked PS capable printer? I don’t see this as a big obstacle.

As far as the codecs, I’d ask why anyone in a business environment really needed them anyway. [Anyone who said they needed them I would suspect as a time waster, and watch closely [g]]

Hi Marc,
Maybe I misunderstood the target market, but I thought these were earmarked for consumers? For business use I personally believe Suse is better suited.

Thanks for the comments, Ron

Ron, perhaps I misunderstood the target market, because in the long run, an individual user is probably being silly if they switch to Linux just to save a few bucks. One could buy XP, and use all other software that is free or open-source.

To me the reason to buy a pc from Dell with Ubuntu is more for the small to medium business who wants to cut costs now and be able to purchase a volume of pcs. If you think about it, for every 5 average business pcs from Dell without Vista, you should be able to purchase a sixth. You won’t immediately have to outfit them with antivirus and antimalware programs, and because most things they’ll be using are business apps, they will tend to change less over time, and when they do they will be fully ’scienced out’ by the time you need to change. Apps that are mature tend to need less support, so there is savings there.

I agree for the sophisticated business, with sophisticated users, I know Suse is the way to go. For the uninitiated, I think Ubuntu is more friendly and hand-holding.

I also see the individual who uses Linux as wanting a lot more control over the build of their pc than Dell is probably willing to give. For example, it was not so long ago that Dell was using weird custom motherboards with cases that only allowed 5 PCI brackets, not 4 like mATX, or 7 like ATX, but 5. I haven’t seen any for awhile from the inside, but they used to stay very close to the same build, simply due to the economy of volume. I don’t think the user of Linux is an ‘economy of volume’ kind of guy or gal.

What Do You Think?

 

Want to Start a Blog Here for Free?

Are you an expert in one subject or another? If your goal is to help others and dispense hard-earned information back to the community, stake a claim on your very own Lockergnome blog today! You can write about anything - no matter the topic. Sign-up to start blogging!

66 queries / 3.727 seconds.