U.S. Judge To Rule On Landmark Internet Porn Law
- 1
- Add a Comment
It should be interesting to to see how this turns out. I am sure many church organizations will be very interested in the outcome of this decision. My personal opinion is that all porn should be banned from the internet or safe guards must be in place to protect our child from accessing the porn sites.
“PHILADELPHIA - A U.S. law designed to prevent children from viewing pornography online would undermine the free speech of millions of adult Internet users, opponents of the measure said Monday.
The law is so imprecisely written it would restrict most adult Internet users to material that is only suitable for children, lawyers for the American Civil Liberties Union and other plaintiffs said in closing arguments of a four-week trial.
The ACLU and others sued the U.S. government, claiming the Child Online Protection Act of 1998 violates the Constitution, and they argued Monday that filtering was a more effective tool that does not curtail free speech.
But attorneys for the U.S. government called the law necessary to protect young people from sexually explicit material and said Internet filtering technology was not good enough to block offending Web sites from personal computers.
“Evidence shows that many parents do not actively use the filters,” said Joel McElvain, an attorney for the U.S. Justice Department.”
Full story here.
Tags: landmark, judge, internet, porn, law, technology, protect, young people, attorney, parents

One Comment
Mike
June 20th, 2008
at 11:08am
I agree that filters are not good enough to stop adult material from being seen by children. There was an easy solution thought about a few years ago but shot down by (ICAN?) to have a top level name of ( .X ?) or similar. That would make it easy to filter out adult web sites. I know some will try to abuse it but if there were strong penalties for the abuse or non filtering it would stop most of it and let consenting adults still have the freedom to view what they would like.