<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for VB(A) Programmer &amp; Tech Nut</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf</link>
	<description>Just another Lockergnome weblog - but with Vista Tips!</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on How to use Windows Explorer to &#8220;filter&#8221; what you see by BlackWolf</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf/2008/01/01/how-to-use-windows-explorer-to-filter-what-you-see/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackWolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 18:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf/2008/01/01/how-to-use-windows-explorer-to-filter-what-you-see/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Oracle:

I realize you probably hate a lot of the standard Windows Crap that is "part of the Windows experience!"...  I do to.  Point of this blog though is to help those who are NOT as advanced as you and I (or who don't like to use third party file manager apps or who CAN'T because their business or company won't allow them to use those apps) and to provide tips to them that they may find useful.  That doesn't mean I don't use or own products that enhance Windows Vista or XP - esp. when it comes to system maintenance and security.

Anyway, thanks for the tip on Explorer² Lite.  I'll take a look at it and see if I like it.

Blackwolf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oracle:</p>
<p>I realize you probably hate a lot of the standard Windows Crap that is &#8220;part of the Windows experience!&#8221;&#8230;  I do to.  Point of this blog though is to help those who are NOT as advanced as you and I (or who don&#8217;t like to use third party file manager apps or who CAN&#8217;T because their business or company won&#8217;t allow them to use those apps) and to provide tips to them that they may find useful.  That doesn&#8217;t mean I don&#8217;t use or own products that enhance Windows Vista or XP - esp. when it comes to system maintenance and security.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for the tip on Explorer² Lite.  I&#8217;ll take a look at it and see if I like it.</p>
<p>Blackwolf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to use Windows Explorer to &#8220;filter&#8221; what you see by the oracle</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf/2008/01/01/how-to-use-windows-explorer-to-filter-what-you-see/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>the oracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 09:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf/2008/01/01/how-to-use-windows-explorer-to-filter-what-you-see/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>The best way to filter is use just about ANY other file manager, as Explorer is hopelessly lame and dumbed down for the average idiot. Explorer² Lite is free, much faster, and far superior to many non-free file managers. 
The best ever file manager for Microsoft operating systems was XTree Pro, but alas Symantec, rat bastards they are, chose to quash it after having bought the company, and butchered an attempt at a  GUI version. (And no, ZTreeBold is NOT the same, as it changed the keystrokes, which were based on WordStar commands)

Give Explorer² Lite a try - maybe you'll be like me a pay for the registered version, simply to thank the author for such a fine FREE product, which has no nasty nags of any kind.  

Back to the point at hand...it has many advanced ways of filtering, and uses a 2 pane style, which somehow MS never got around to realizing was far superior and allows for much greater ease of use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best way to filter is use just about ANY other file manager, as Explorer is hopelessly lame and dumbed down for the average idiot. Explorer² Lite is free, much faster, and far superior to many non-free file managers.<br />
The best ever file manager for Microsoft operating systems was XTree Pro, but alas Symantec, rat bastards they are, chose to quash it after having bought the company, and butchered an attempt at a  GUI version. (And no, ZTreeBold is NOT the same, as it changed the keystrokes, which were based on WordStar commands)</p>
<p>Give Explorer² Lite a try - maybe you&#8217;ll be like me a pay for the registered version, simply to thank the author for such a fine FREE product, which has no nasty nags of any kind.  </p>
<p>Back to the point at hand&#8230;it has many advanced ways of filtering, and uses a 2 pane style, which somehow MS never got around to realizing was far superior and allows for much greater ease of use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vista &#38; Toolbars - How To Set Them Up by Mario</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf/2007/08/25/vista-toolbars-how-to-set-them-up/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 20:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf/2007/08/25/vista-toolbars-how-to-set-them-up/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Never mind....found it!
Once the toolbar is created, you simply need to right-click on it and select another toolbar from the Toolbars sub-menu and it will be added to that toolbar 'area'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind&#8230;.found it!<br />
Once the toolbar is created, you simply need to right-click on it and select another toolbar from the Toolbars sub-menu and it will be added to that toolbar &#8216;area&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vista &#38; Toolbars - How To Set Them Up by Mario</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf/2007/08/25/vista-toolbars-how-to-set-them-up/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 20:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf/2007/08/25/vista-toolbars-how-to-set-them-up/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>How do you 'stack' toolbars?
In your screenshot, you seem to have multiple toolbars on the right that are stacked over each other; for example, your Visual Studio icon is in a separate toolbar or a separate group.

Same as the top toolbars; you have Desktop, Favorites, etc.  Are they different toolbars or ?

Thanks,
Mario</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you &#8217;stack&#8217; toolbars?<br />
In your screenshot, you seem to have multiple toolbars on the right that are stacked over each other; for example, your Visual Studio icon is in a separate toolbar or a separate group.</p>
<p>Same as the top toolbars; you have Desktop, Favorites, etc.  Are they different toolbars or ?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Mario</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vista Wouldn&#8217;t Boot After Upgrading Memory&#8230; by Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf/2007/10/18/vista-wouldnt-boot-after-upgrading-memory/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 04:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf/2007/10/18/vista-wouldnt-boot-after-upgrading-memory/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Hello, I just managed to catch your thread and I think I may have a similar problem.  Using Win XP Pro and OCZ 3200 DDR400 Dual Channel (512MB) for quite a while.  Recently I bought another dual kit, OCZ 3200.  Anyway I reboot, goes through the BIOS it sees the addtional 1gig, no problem, all looks good until it starts booting windows, right after the moving "eye" it restarts, a never ending loop.  So I take out the additional memory, it recovers thankfully!  Howver windows states it had to use the backup registry copy??(never seen this before) and that there was a device problem? but M/S had no information on the issue.  Any futher thoughts? it doesn't boot far enough along to see if it is a device issue, but device conflict was mentioned on recovery.  Just seems funny in this day in age, so much for plug and play.  I hope OCZ has the answer.  Regards, Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, I just managed to catch your thread and I think I may have a similar problem.  Using Win XP Pro and OCZ 3200 DDR400 Dual Channel (512MB) for quite a while.  Recently I bought another dual kit, OCZ 3200.  Anyway I reboot, goes through the BIOS it sees the addtional 1gig, no problem, all looks good until it starts booting windows, right after the moving &#8220;eye&#8221; it restarts, a never ending loop.  So I take out the additional memory, it recovers thankfully!  Howver windows states it had to use the backup registry copy??(never seen this before) and that there was a device problem? but M/S had no information on the issue.  Any futher thoughts? it doesn&#8217;t boot far enough along to see if it is a device issue, but device conflict was mentioned on recovery.  Just seems funny in this day in age, so much for plug and play.  I hope OCZ has the answer.  Regards, Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MacBook Pro Runs Vista Faster Than Any Other Laptop! by marc klink</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf/2007/10/31/macbook-pro-runs-vista-faster-than-any-other-laptop/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>marc klink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf/2007/10/31/macbook-pro-runs-vista-faster-than-any-other-laptop/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>That full review states nowhere what other laptops were compared. It can't really be considered authoritative when the other units are not revealed. 

The Apple machine is undoubtedly a good one, but no one really buys a laptop looking for the last bit of speed. If the person is really interested in speed, a desktop is purchased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That full review states nowhere what other laptops were compared. It can&#8217;t really be considered authoritative when the other units are not revealed. </p>
<p>The Apple machine is undoubtedly a good one, but no one really buys a laptop looking for the last bit of speed. If the person is really interested in speed, a desktop is purchased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vista Wouldn&#8217;t Boot After Upgrading Memory&#8230; by BlackWolf</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf/2007/10/18/vista-wouldnt-boot-after-upgrading-memory/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackWolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf/2007/10/18/vista-wouldnt-boot-after-upgrading-memory/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Hi Pedro:
 
Sorry it took me so long to get back to you.  
 
Here's what I believe is happening:
 
Since you are trying to run 3 sticks of RAM, and 2 are from one manuf. and 1 from the other, you are running into a conflict because of different speeds and specifications of the chips.
 
If I remember correctly, most motherboards (I can't be completely certain of your situation since you didn't give me the exact model number and Gigabyte has something like 20 or 30 motherboards that have 8n in them), esp. high end boards, need the memory installed in pairs - that is, if you have 2 or more memory sticks that are the same, they need to be placed in the memory slots that are on the same channel, while any odd stick gets put into the slot that is on a separate channel. 
 
With three sticks of RAM, what you need to do, is look at the slots that the memory sticks go in.  Two of them should be the same color (usually blue).  Those two slots should be where the new memory goes, since they are the same.  The other slot (usually black), should be where your older memory goes.  This ensures that the paired sticks that are the same, are on the same channel together, while the odd stick is on a separate channel.  
 
Note:  The two slots that are on the same channel may not be right next to each other - so, if you have your old chip in the first memory slot and it's blue, and then you tried to put 1 of your new sticks in the slot next to it, because it's a different channel, it'll work.  
 
The moment that you try to put the 2nd new stick in the third channel, assuming it too is blue, you are now putting unmatched pairs on the same channel, and your system won't boot, because it can't figure out what the correct memory timings are.
 
By moving the old chip to the middle channel and the new chip to the 1st and last channel (ASSUMING you have only three slots) you should be able to overcome the problem you've been having.
 
As for Windows XP, it is fully capable of running up to 4 Gigs of RAM, so that should not be the cause of the problem you are having.
 
Hope that helps!

BlackWolf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pedro:</p>
<p>Sorry it took me so long to get back to you.  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I believe is happening:</p>
<p>Since you are trying to run 3 sticks of RAM, and 2 are from one manuf. and 1 from the other, you are running into a conflict because of different speeds and specifications of the chips.</p>
<p>If I remember correctly, most motherboards (I can&#8217;t be completely certain of your situation since you didn&#8217;t give me the exact model number and Gigabyte has something like 20 or 30 motherboards that have 8n in them), esp. high end boards, need the memory installed in pairs - that is, if you have 2 or more memory sticks that are the same, they need to be placed in the memory slots that are on the same channel, while any odd stick gets put into the slot that is on a separate channel. </p>
<p>With three sticks of RAM, what you need to do, is look at the slots that the memory sticks go in.  Two of them should be the same color (usually blue).  Those two slots should be where the new memory goes, since they are the same.  The other slot (usually black), should be where your older memory goes.  This ensures that the paired sticks that are the same, are on the same channel together, while the odd stick is on a separate channel.  </p>
<p>Note:  The two slots that are on the same channel may not be right next to each other - so, if you have your old chip in the first memory slot and it&#8217;s blue, and then you tried to put 1 of your new sticks in the slot next to it, because it&#8217;s a different channel, it&#8217;ll work.  </p>
<p>The moment that you try to put the 2nd new stick in the third channel, assuming it too is blue, you are now putting unmatched pairs on the same channel, and your system won&#8217;t boot, because it can&#8217;t figure out what the correct memory timings are.</p>
<p>By moving the old chip to the middle channel and the new chip to the 1st and last channel (ASSUMING you have only three slots) you should be able to overcome the problem you&#8217;ve been having.</p>
<p>As for Windows XP, it is fully capable of running up to 4 Gigs of RAM, so that should not be the cause of the problem you are having.</p>
<p>Hope that helps!</p>
<p>BlackWolf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vista Wouldn&#8217;t Boot After Upgrading Memory&#8230; by BlackWolf</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf/2007/10/18/vista-wouldnt-boot-after-upgrading-memory/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackWolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf/2007/10/18/vista-wouldnt-boot-after-upgrading-memory/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Ken:

Sorry for the delay in response - but I live in S. Korea at the moment so I am between 13-18 hours ahead of you time wise.

Anyway: There are several things you can do to try to narrow this down.

It would help if I knew some things too - for example, I'm assuming that you are running Windows Vista on this machine since you didn't specify otherwise - if not, then please let me know as the troubleshooting techniques are different for each OS.  Also, what sort of machine is it?  Laptop/Desktop? What hardware does it have? and so on.

Without this info, I can only say in general, the problems that you are experiencing are probably being caused by a network card, a sound/audio card, PCMCIA drivers, or your video card.  It is possible that you are having problems due to something else, but it's not possible to tell without more information - basically, nothing can be completely ruled out at this stage.

Also, have you checked to make sure you are installing the correct type of RAM for your system?  IE: If you system uses DDR RAM, you are not trying to put DDR2 RAM in it.  Are you mixing your RAM - that is, are you leaving in one chip and adding another chip that may have different specs?  If so, try swapping the chips (if you can) to different slots/positions.

Since you say the RAM is good, I'm assuming that everything I just mentioned in the above paragraph has already been done, so on to the next step:

Can you boot into safe mode with the new RAM installed?  If so, then you almost certainly have a driver problem or conflict of some sort.

While in safe mode, bring up the run dialog (Press and hold the windows key and the press the "R" key).  Type in "msconfig" - no quotes.  Once the System Configuration window opens up, click the "Boot" tab and enable and enable "OS boot information".

When you reboot the next time, you will see a list of drivers being loaded.  If at any point, the system hangs for more than a couple of minutes at this screen, then you can see what the last driver being loaded was.  While this doesn't mean 100% that this is the driver causing the problem, it does indicate at least where you should look to see where the problem might be hiding.
You should also enable "Boot Log" so that a log file will be generated during boot.  If you can't find a problem with the drivers as described above, go to the boot log and see what is failing to load properly.

Hope this helps!

BlackWolf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken:</p>
<p>Sorry for the delay in response - but I live in S. Korea at the moment so I am between 13-18 hours ahead of you time wise.</p>
<p>Anyway: There are several things you can do to try to narrow this down.</p>
<p>It would help if I knew some things too - for example, I&#8217;m assuming that you are running Windows Vista on this machine since you didn&#8217;t specify otherwise - if not, then please let me know as the troubleshooting techniques are different for each OS.  Also, what sort of machine is it?  Laptop/Desktop? What hardware does it have? and so on.</p>
<p>Without this info, I can only say in general, the problems that you are experiencing are probably being caused by a network card, a sound/audio card, PCMCIA drivers, or your video card.  It is possible that you are having problems due to something else, but it&#8217;s not possible to tell without more information - basically, nothing can be completely ruled out at this stage.</p>
<p>Also, have you checked to make sure you are installing the correct type of RAM for your system?  IE: If you system uses DDR RAM, you are not trying to put DDR2 RAM in it.  Are you mixing your RAM - that is, are you leaving in one chip and adding another chip that may have different specs?  If so, try swapping the chips (if you can) to different slots/positions.</p>
<p>Since you say the RAM is good, I&#8217;m assuming that everything I just mentioned in the above paragraph has already been done, so on to the next step:</p>
<p>Can you boot into safe mode with the new RAM installed?  If so, then you almost certainly have a driver problem or conflict of some sort.</p>
<p>While in safe mode, bring up the run dialog (Press and hold the windows key and the press the &#8220;R&#8221; key).  Type in &#8220;msconfig&#8221; - no quotes.  Once the System Configuration window opens up, click the &#8220;Boot&#8221; tab and enable and enable &#8220;OS boot information&#8221;.</p>
<p>When you reboot the next time, you will see a list of drivers being loaded.  If at any point, the system hangs for more than a couple of minutes at this screen, then you can see what the last driver being loaded was.  While this doesn&#8217;t mean 100% that this is the driver causing the problem, it does indicate at least where you should look to see where the problem might be hiding.<br />
You should also enable &#8220;Boot Log&#8221; so that a log file will be generated during boot.  If you can&#8217;t find a problem with the drivers as described above, go to the boot log and see what is failing to load properly.</p>
<p>Hope this helps!</p>
<p>BlackWolf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vista Wouldn&#8217;t Boot After Upgrading Memory&#8230; by Pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf/2007/10/18/vista-wouldnt-boot-after-upgrading-memory/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 22:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf/2007/10/18/vista-wouldnt-boot-after-upgrading-memory/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>I'm running a gigabyte 8n board with a gig of corsair RAM. I recently bought two more 1GB sticks. The modules are both good but for some unknown reason they won't work together. I can fit my old RAM with a newer module but not the two new modules together. I'm on XP. The diagnostics screen loads and the RAM is all recognised but I don't get to windows even in safe mode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m running a gigabyte 8n board with a gig of corsair RAM. I recently bought two more 1GB sticks. The modules are both good but for some unknown reason they won&#8217;t work together. I can fit my old RAM with a newer module but not the two new modules together. I&#8217;m on XP. The diagnostics screen loads and the RAM is all recognised but I don&#8217;t get to windows even in safe mode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vista Wouldn&#8217;t Boot After Upgrading Memory&#8230; by Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf/2007/10/18/vista-wouldnt-boot-after-upgrading-memory/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockergnome.com/blackwolf/2007/10/18/vista-wouldnt-boot-after-upgrading-memory/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I am having the same problem as you had, in upgrading the amount of RAM in the system.  The only difference is its not the Network Card.  Any ideas on how to locate the offending driver.  (the memory is good)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am having the same problem as you had, in upgrading the amount of RAM in the system.  The only difference is its not the Network Card.  Any ideas on how to locate the offending driver.  (the memory is good)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
